1.What is net neutrality? Why has the Internet operated under net neutrality up to this point in time?
Network neutrality is also called network neutrality. Internet neutrality or net equality is the principle that Internet service providers and governments should treat all data on the Internet equally, rather than users, content, websites, platforms, applications, additional types of devices or modes of communication. In short, network neutrality is the concept that Internet service providers must allow customers to access content and application equally, regardless of the source or nature of the content.
The Internet is indeed neutral now; all Internet traffic is treated equally by the Internet backbone owners according to the first - to - first - served principle. The Internet is neutral because it is built on the telephone line, which is bound by the "common transport" law. These laws require telephone companies to treat all telephone and customers equally. Telephone companies can't provide additional benefits for customers who are willing to pay higher premiums for faster or more clear calls, which are called layered services.
2.Who’s in favor of net neutrality? Who’s opposed? Why?
(1)Those organizations that are in favor of network neutrality include MoveOn.org, the Christian Union, the American Library Association, every major consumer group, many blogs and small businesses, and some large Internet Co, such as Google and Amazon. Some members of the United States Congress also support network neutrality. The team believes that the risk of censorship increases when network operators can selectively prevent or slow down access to certain content. If the user can't download or access the content quickly, others worry about the slow transmission rate's impact on its business model.
(2)Those who oppose network neutrality include telecommunications and Cable Tv Co. They hope to charge different prices based on the amount of bandwidth consumed on the Internet. Some companies report that 5% of the customers use half the capacity of the local product line without paying more than the low consumption customers. They say that metered pricing is the "most equitable way" for investment in its network infrastructure. Those who oppose network neutrality argue that this eliminates the motivation of network providers to innovate, provide new capabilities and upgrade to new technologies.
(3)Another Bob Kahn, a co inventor of internet protocol, is against network neutrality. It claims that it eliminates the innovation of network providers, provides new power and power to upgrade to new technology.
3.What would be the impact on individual users, businesses, and government if Internet providers switched to a tiered service model for transmission over land lines as well as wireless?
Supporters of network neutrality argue that the neutral Internet encourages everyone to innovate without the phone or Cable Tv Co or other authorities. A more fair competition environment has created numerous new businesses. As business and society increasingly surf the Internet, allowing unrestricted information flows is crucial to free markets and democracy. A large number of users of network bandwidth will pay higher prices without having to provide better services. Even those users who use less bandwidth may encounter the same situation.
Network owners believe that regulatory measures such as bills proposed by the advocates of network neutrality will impede the competitiveness of the United States by strangling innovation and harm customers who will benefit from discriminatory network practices. Internet services in the United States have lagged behind other countries in terms of overall speed, cost and quality of service, increasing the credibility of service providers' views. Obviously, by increasing the cost of important users of network bandwidth, telecommunications and cable company and Internet service providers will increase their profitability.
4.It has been said that net neutrality is the most important issue facing the Internet since the advent of the Internet. Discuss the implications of this statement.
No one owns the Internet. However, someone has to pay to access the Internet and provide all the content and services on the Internet. Personal Internet users pay Internet service providers to use their services, and no matter how much or how much Internet they use, they usually pay a fixed subscription fee. As a result, one side of the debate is focused on ensuring the continuous development and improvement of the Internet infrastructure, while the other pays attention to how to pay for it. Some people believe that the elimination of network neutrality will lead to censorship, while others believe that all content will remain available, but the price is different.
5.Are you in favor of legislation enforcing network neutrality? Why or why not?
(1)As far as I am concerned, I agreed with the legislation enforcing network neutrality. I surmise that there ought to be enactment that authorize unhindered internet. I say it from a point of view of a customary web utilized. Of the lack of bias is gone, enormous organizations will be responsible for the data transmission costs and assignment. Just rich and bug organizations will have the capacity to purchase colossal data transmissions. Standard clients will be left with no alternative yet to utilize moderate web administrations. This will restrict the entrance to data from normal customary clients who are the foundation of the nation's economy and who get a chance to improve because of net correspondence.
(2)With tires web show, the high bidders will get their hands on quick web. Private companies will be abandoned in these offers to fast because of their constrained monetary assets. New business visionaries will have somewhat opportunity to remain within the sight of officially settled colossal corporate.
Comments
Post a Comment